2012年11月5日星期一

热情的美帝国主义的第一天

今天是我到Tampa的第一天,我现在可以说是精疲力尽了。但是我还是想把这一切的一切记录下来,主要是还要等我老妈的电话。
从乌鲁木齐出发,我可以感觉到老妈深深的不舍,我第一次离开家哭了,而且哭的自己控制不了,我也看见老妈哭的很凶。这不只是对理想对信念的执着,而且是对未来的忧虑和担心。我到北京后做地铁去晶瑞那里,我就开始晕车,心里就有一点点后悔的念头了,我这是干什么,我可以生活的安逸,可以去滑雪,可以去游泳,我干什么这么折腾我自己。到了晶瑞家里,躺在被窝里我真的有后悔的念头。但是无论如何人在砧板上了,不能不去了。

说实话,在北京的那一夜真的很难熬,好冷啊,老妈叫我带羽绒服我又是那么的不屑一顾。登机时,我又发扬了一次干什么比较快的优势,以迅雷不及掩耳盗铃响叮当之势坐在了我的座位上,环顾前面,后面,左面都是中国人,心里还盘算完了。没想到让人惊喜的是,一个老大叔George做在了我的身边,第一句话我对他说了“Hi”,他对我说了标准的农村腔“你好”。是他让我知道了原来福罗里达州并不是美国最南端的国土,还有一个什么小岛的,居然在Cuba的旁边,但是是美国的国土。我不仅感慨一句,这人要是命好你怎么都成。我们一路聊了很久,说实话一是我的英语真的不怎么样,二是他年纪却是大了,而且他说他会标准的法语,所以听他说英语的确有点累。估计就是老外听河南人说河南话吧,我们都能听懂,但是老外头就大了。而且一向认为自己具有super-ego 的我,居然一直认为从中国到芝加哥飞的是太平洋。还专门要了一个飞机右侧的座位就等着看看浩瀚的太平洋了,居然George告诉我是从北极走。太shit了,从北京直接到哈尔滨那嘎达飞了。

飞机上的生活真的太shit了,坐也不是,倚也不是,仰也不是。终于熬了块13个小时,到了芝加哥当地时间5:20,相机太shit了,先上一张芝加哥的晨景图吧。试试美帝国主义的网速和社会主义优越的网速的差距,是不是真像Obama所说的100年。
 靠,明明是99年,可恶的Obama居然给我们社会主义的伟大中国多算了一年,太坏了。
到了芝加哥以后,因为知道要出关很多麻烦的事情,我就又发挥了一下我人小,速度快,没行李的优势,在交I-94表的时候没有排队,等我等行李的时候,发现那个人山人海啊。嘿嘿,得意的笑,小样,和姐比,姐是干啥的,啥运动不会?本来想一路给我妈录像拍照的,但是赫然几个大字在墙上,No phone,No photos, No smoking,想起Obama说的Chinese should play by rules.我的耻辱心就发酵了,我也是守游戏规则的人。
虽然我做了芝加哥机场的图片,但是只是平面的,到了发现才是个晕头转向,谢谢George一家人对我的指点,万分感谢。有利有弊,是方便了自己,但是你还是对路标不熟悉,下次还是抓瞎,这就像是开车一样,你永远只是坐车,就永远不会记路。
猜猜这是什么?在芝加哥机场T3的H8坐前面的女卫生间里的东西。我上完厕所后研究了半天,显示用脚踩,后是用手压?
最后居然被我发现了,是一只手扒开一边,就可以打开的纸篓,我的天啊,谁上完厕所会这样做啊在中国。脏死了!

下面就是等Chicago到Tampa 的航班了,登机牌上写的是805AM。但是拖呀拖,拖了有一个小时多才起飞。By the way,芝加哥机场的安检真实先进极了,就像医院体检照胸透一样,人站在里面,举起双手,卡卡2秒钟出来,居然就把你全身上下细节完毕了,女保安指着我左面的裤兜里嘟囔了一句,我赶紧把钱拿出来澄清,急的居然说了一句chinese money.我真的太怂了。


我也是那种能躺着不会坐着,能坐着不会站着的人,在国内也都是飞。但是从来没有见过这么小的飞机,我一登机,居然左手边就是驾驶舱,shit,我一直以为每个飞机都有头等舱呢。好像就一个驾驶员吧。此时我拿出机票记录单,终于明白了MC 什么意思了,Micro微型飞机的意思吧?






美国的机场工作人员技术就是厉害,一个车头脱了那么多行李车,怪不得人家速率高呢,中国一个车头拖一个,咱这技术也不能拖多啊,动车拖的挺多,不就追尾了吗?这让我想起了北京的老式公交汽车,中间带个转接盘的那个,那个技术不是一般的。

然后在跑道上,看到了一个巨大的,吓我一跳。而且没有窗户,莫非是某某局长的专机?


让我们在看一下芝加哥的白天吧,不过今天天气一般般,有点小阴。



奇怪的事情发生了,这是什么?太美的云海了。







我真的不是天生的飞行家,像Jake Sully一样,我莫非已经得了高空幻觉症了,我这么觉得这4涨照片像是海上波涛汹涌的海浪,我当时就像吐了。



谁能告诉我这是什么? 麦田怪圈??不会吧?稻田?粮仓?军事基地?who can tell me?




我居然看见海岸线了,激动不已,我赶紧拿出美国地图,按chicago到Tampa 的直线距离飞行,不应该看到啊,我赶紧用了我的杀手锏“excuse me”问旁边的老兄,但是他居然也不知道这是哪里?他居然告诉我是在GA,我说我没有发现GA州有湖泊啊?然后他听了下机舱广播才说maybe mexico gulf.这地理还不如我这个老外呢。




像不像一个女儿穿着青色长袍仰卧在哪里,嘿嘿,我的想象力真实丰富。

莫非这就是传说中的Clearwater清水的白色沙滩?也算是去过了吧。嘿嘿
 根据飞行方向,这应该是St. Petersburg,飞行员的技术不是一般的,快把我转吐了。


 这是什么,按照地图,应该是美军在Tampa的美军基地。

我看了半天才看明白,这是如何的布局,游艇别墅区吧?


注意到没有,后面还有2个桥,这就是3个链接tampa 和clearwater 的3座桥。

Tampa airport,看平面地图很简单,但是层数众多,头晕转向。谢谢小胖丫头White Eimy.
最终在机场工作人员的指引下,我终于上了No.30 bus,不得不说美国的黑妹妹人都很热心。沿途也上来了10余人,但是都是最最最最底层的人,拾荒者,保洁工等。美国给了他们这些人活下去的勇气。
PS:好玩的是,美国政府为了鼓励大家积极投票,居然巴士上贴出公告在Nov.6当天,拿投票单可以免费做Bus一天。
今天真的是不容易的一天,感谢今天遇见的所有帮助过我的人,无论是白的,黑的还是花的。你们让我感受颇多。我内心感激你们八倍祖宗,同时,我也希望我的这次痛苦的晕机过程是值得的,我能够成功说服Beverly and Barry.如果真的失败了,我真的觉得我没有勇气在这样折腾了,真的太累了,不知道这个秘密还要继续保持多久,女人们还要傻多久?

2012年10月27日星期六

What exactly drive human move on?

Without a doubt, human is the smartest animal on earth, even though we are not the oldest animal on earth. Apparently, human have evolved a very different route from all non-human animals. I wonder what exactly set us on the path to humanity and what exactly drive human move on in future?

Someone described human progress speed like this: at the beginning, human crawled on the ground for many years, then stood up and walked, and ran in the latest 500 years, and flew in latest 100 years. I don’t know what verb I should use to describe human future after the fly. In my opinion, there are two aspects evolution on human evolutionary way, one is in human physiology, the evolution of body is very slow, we are almost as same as our ancestor 500 years ago, even 2000 years ago, and there is no big difference in body; the other one is in human psychology, compared to the slight evolution of our human body, our psychological evolution is very huge. it is relevant to an important but not completely solved human subjects: Evolutionary Psychology(EP). You can’t imagine that today there also have big gap during human being on same earth and same time, because of some system. There are about three-hundred years gap during two group of people, French send their King on the guillotine in the 18 th century, but today North Korean also swear to defend their fat Kim, although there is no any difference during the body evolution between France and North Korean. Till now, many people are not able to figure out the relationship of citizen, country and political parties. I guess if Father of the Nation Sun Yat-sen is still alive, he must cry to death for the servility of his descendants 100 years later. So I can conclude that the psychological evolution lagged far behind in the physiological evolution.

If I want to talk about body and soul, I must talk about Rene Descartes and his Dualism first. Rene Descartes explicitly asked a question ”are humans merely physical machines, merely physical things”, he answered “No”, and he agreed that animals are machines. In fact, he called them “beast machines”. he said animals, non-human animals are merely robots, but people are different. There is a duality of people. Like animals, we possess physical meterial bodies, but unlike animals, what we are is not physical. We are immaterial souls that possess physical bodies, that have physical bodies, that reside in physical bodies, that connect to physical bodies. He claimed that for humans at least, there are two separate things, there is our material bodies and there is our immaterial minds.

Frankly speaking, I don’t agree with Descartes 100%, but I don’t agree with this view “people are nothing more than machine of meat” at all. While I agree that the history is always changed by a small group of people, and truth always rests with the minority, and the minority is always stronger than the majority, because the minority is generally formed by those who really have an opinion, while the strength of a majority is illusory, formed by the gangs who have no opinion. Majority usually didn't’ work in human progress, even retroaction, otherwise Giordano Bruno was not burned to death in the Square of the Flowers in 1600.

There is no denying that human indeed went on a specail way separated from other species, and what exactly drive us to move on? Adam Smith in “The Wealth of Nations” proposed an term “invisible hand” to describe the natural force that guides free market capitalism through competition for scarce resources. I believe there must have an “invisible hand” in human evolution to drive human move on, and I call it “Self-awareness”. When an individual pursues his/her self-awareness, he/she indirectly promotes the evolution of human. It shows that unity of sciences and social sciences again. In my opinion, the basic instinct to drive human evolution is the awakening of human "Self-awareness". I like these words very much “We, alone on earth, can rebel against the tyranny of the selfish replicators. Self-cognition allows us to realize that our own interests can well be in conflict with the interests of our genes” by Richard Dawkins in “The Selfish Gene”. It means we are not genetically manipulated, we still have souls, rather than mere reproduction, this is the real meaning of life. All non-human animal behaviors are for survival and reproduction, human already luckily started to think separation from the endless proliferation of activities to think about value of life.(PS: just male, but not female)

There are many phenomena which can show the similarity and difference between human behavior and non-human behavior, that is why I do not agree with David Buss on his theory of Evolutionary Psychology. In his theory, human are just machine of meat, men want to spread their genes to find women as many as possible, women want to survive to find a rich and powerful men as possible as they can. This is just the logic of non-human, not human being.

1, Female non-human animals are only capable of mating and producing young once a year during their oestrus period, which lasts for only a few weeks. There is no doubt that the only purpose why animals mating is reproduction, at least for female, while some male animals also want to mate when not in female estrus period, they will suffer the vicious attacks from female. This demonstrates that some male non-human animals have began the consciousness which is to get rid of reproduction to pursue sexual pleasure, while females still in the reproduction cycle.

Apparently, male human have been out of the reproduction trap, and they have self-awareness to mate for pursuing sexual pleasure, not only for reproduction. In many developed countries, more and more men choose vasectomies to prevent wives getting pregnant. Do these men's libido reduce, because of they lose the ability of reproduction? Definitely not. I think lots of men don’t remind reproduction, when they during a sex. Unfortunately, women not only take the responsibility for human reproduction as same as female non-human animals, but also become sex slaves during non-oestrus period, after the awakening of male human self-awareness. Freud stated in his “three essays on the theory of sexuality” in 1905 “The vagina has value only as a receptacle for the penis.” He is right, but women still expect to get so-called multiple orgasms depending on their useless receptacles.

Some evolutionary scientists proposed that the reason why men need to mate in any time is because of the poor living conditions of children, and a lot of children died when in young age, so men have to evolve the characteristics that men want to plant the seed in any time. I think it is a stupid view. The population of species depends on the number of reproductive female during this species, not the male, evermore, it is not helpful to have sex during female non-oestrus period. We can imagine that if only 3.5 billion men and only one woman left on the world, even the 3.5 billion men are constantly intercourse with the woman, in second year, will there be 3.5 billion children born? No, definitely not. Many Mammals also have one-child once as same as human, but they are still only in estrus mating. Chimpanzees are the most relatives of human, but they still mate during female oestrus period. Such an argument is absolutely ridiculous, just make excuses for selfish genes of male.

Another question: masturbation and oral sex also happen during non-human animals, but mostly in viviparous animals. From other side, it also reflects the different species have different evolution.

2,Id, Ego, Superego

Freud (1925) has repeatedly expressed the opinion that on the average, the female superego , compared with that of the male, is organized rather weakly, is unstable, and has no independence. Generally speaking, he wanted to say that females do not have strong Super-Egos. I hate to admit, but I have to admit that situation.

The id is the unorganized part of the personality structure that contains a human's basic, instinctual drives, and acts according to the "pleasure principle", seeking to avoid pain or displeasure aroused by increases in instinctual tension. I think it is the primitive form of “Maximize my payoff and minimize my cost” from animals basic instinct. Full life is dominated by the survival and reproduction.

In my opinion, the ego showed up when human self-awareness start occurrence. People start to have sense of shame, passion, disappointment, helplessness and sadness so on and so forth, what called as human feeling, but people are still in a state of ignorance, they don’t know what exactly they want and what exactly other people want, and they can’t put themselves into other people's shoes. Someone start to explore the world and our own, but in ego phase, due to the limitations of human understanding, there are full of lies and deception. Human try to establish so-called game rules to make human to be a moral height, whatever in social system, or psychologically, but with very little effect. Because human nature can’t be changed by anything or anyone, the result is under the guise of communism, someone treated people as tyranny, and under the guise of marriage, someone cheated on the partner.

Superego, it is that stage human awareness reaches a certain height. First, we have to admit the nature of human-selfish. Second, we establish a set of rules to protect everyone legitimate interests under the Id satisfaction, of course we really have to know what we want. We have empathy and can deal with the interests conflict correctly and rationally between two groups, and achieve a balance in the interests of our own and others or individual interests and ethnic interests. Of course, Superego can not work without the progress of science and philosophy. Natural science goes first, human know why water flows down, and why sun rises everyday, so humans began to look at the world with rational eyes. Philosophy of science is the next one. “The Wealth of Nations” by Adam Smith, and “Separation of powers” by Montesquieu occurrence. These are derived from research of human nature. They were all trying to find the nature of human being(Id), and then build game rules to protect basic human right. What is superego? Thomas Hobbes kept trying to develop a theory of society which begins actually with biology, with biological processes, and build it up gradually from biology to understanding of the social, of the individual, and from the individual to understand society. He is right, and what Hobbes tried to do is to find human superego depending on the human Id.

This theory of Id, Ego and Superego is proposed by Freud, there is no doubt that he thought he had superego of course. Now let’s see the whole life of the man who had Superego. Freud was also a very difficult person to get along, he basically has fallouts with every body, and maybe he thought other people were all stupid and can’t understand his ideas. The same things also happened on Newton, if we search the history of human, we can find that the same things happened almost on everyone who changed human history, because those people who can change the world are very few, in the eyes of the general public, they are inverse. They are alone in soul.

If Frued still alive, I want to tell him fact to face that the beginning of female superego will start as revolt to male sex dictatorship. As a male, I don’t know whether he still go to point out that cruel fact women don’t have superego, and let later generation unlock it. I agree with John Stuart Mill on his point that “women are actually worse in their conditions than slaves, because men expect women even love, rather than just obedience, at least from slaves they don’t expect love” in “The Subjection of Women” (according to the open course from Yale: Foundations of Modern Social Theory). Mill felt that the oppression of women was one of the few remaining relics from ancient times, a set of prejudices that severely impeded the progress of humanity.

In human history, we never stop searching world outside, as same as human ourselves, especially in recent 500 years.

In the 15th century, from Columbus discovered the American continent to Magellan's voyage around the world, it is the first time to prove that the Earth is round. Nicolaus Copernicus first proposed “heliocentric” to replace "geocentric". These ruthless facts deny our superiority complex that our human being is the center of the universe.

In the 18 th century, Darwin's Theory Of Evolution first broke down the Myth of God created man, although there are still some problem we can’t use the theory to explain well, but this is first time that our human is liberated from theological shackles.

In human evolutionary way, we go forward step by step slowly and firmly to future, all by our human self-awareness awakening.

Human goes step by step, slowly and firmly into the future on the road, all by human self-awareness drive human move on. In the era of President George Washington, you can’t imagine that an African-American was elected to be President, but Obama did that. Condoleezza Rice was the first female African-American secretary of state, as well as the second African American (after Colin Powell), and the second woman (after Madeleine Albright). Rice was President Bush's National Security Advisor during his first term, making her the first woman to serve in that position. I believe that we will see that an Asian-American or female also appear in the President of United States. Because the election a President doesn’t depend on the color of his skin, sex, high or short, fat or thin, sexual orientation, but the concept of his/her governance. Let’s wait and see.


2012年9月20日星期四

Take it easy, U.S.

Christopher Stevens, the American ambassador, and three other embassy staff were killed in Libya in 11Spe. 2012. I am very sorry to hear that. I think Hillary certainly can not figure out why the United States spent money and efforts to help the Libyan people to overthrow the dictatorship, in order to establish a democratic country, but just a small personal movie aroused them to anti-American. Hillary was born in United States where is full of freedom, democracy, openness, human rights, of course she can not understand the mentality of those people.

1 Poverty
There is no doubt that the majority of those attacks are the proletarians. They don't have job or income, so they are fragile, sensitive, and easily enlarge their anger and dissatisfaction with society because of an Individual event. I think that is another form of hatred of the rich. Karl Marx's words: proletarians have nothing to lose, so they don’t have any limitations and can show the ugly side of human nature. Helping them out of poverty is the most essential.

2 Real desires should come from within
Real desire should come from deep inside of people, like sense of well – being or sense of security, no one can give them, but only themselves, as same as orgasm, whatever female or male, the desire for orgasm must come from within, no one can help you, regardless how hard work they have. Before the people don’t really realize and accept the universal values from within, and arouse the desire for change from deep inside, it doesn’t work only rely on outside forces from the U.S.. The only result is the United States put herself into a quagmire and passive. The U.S. only can give them a shell of democracy, but the spirit of democracy should come from within of the nation, they must have their own Voltaire and Rousseau, they have to recognize the human rights, government agencies, and religious from deep soul. A real change must come from the within, then to the behavior.

3 Values export
Cultural values ​​export is slow, maybe take some years, even decades or centuries, especially in some areas where religion above the law and sovereignty above human rights. They can’t understand why Dutch accepted it when Philip II, King of Spain, announced that the Netherlands is an integral part of Spain in the 16th century, and Dutch recognized it when Spain sent a new Governor, but Dutch began to rebel when Philip II wanted to get money from their pockets. They can’t understand at last the Dutch actually entrusted their own country to the Queen of UK Elizabeth I. Thoughts of people there were detained by tradition cultural generations after generations. The U.S. should change their values ideologically one step a time.

U.S. wants to help these countries into the modern society, not only in the material, but also more importantly, in their values, and the U.S. really has a long way to go. In many less developed regions, people still rely on the blood and religion to organize social activities, rather than on the law and contract. Dictatorship can be overthrown easily by U.S. powerful weapons, but the inferiority root of a nation is hard to change in short time. I don’t understand the culture of the Arab, but I know Chinese very well. Although a lot of people in the United States against one child policy, and thought it is inhumane to restrict human rights, but I do not agree to the views at this point, because Americans do not understand the Chinese people at all. The only purpose of everyone is maximize the payoffs and minimize the costs, but according to different values in different nations. Chinese people now still in the original situation of gene spread, and most of them will choose to have lots of children in order to seize social resources as much as they can, of course the blood is the most reliable to expand their own interests radius, in order to maximize their own interests, at last, the ultimate goal is to increase the sense of security. If this policy is canceled, I think Chinese population will quickly reach 20 billion in the next 10 years. So American democracy and freedom should be on the ground.

Modernization of a nation doesn’t only mean have powerful weapons, or drive advanced cars, or use iPhone 5, but mainly refers to modern values​​. The U.S. has good intention to help the world people into modern society, because she has fully realized world integration – global village, helping people of other countries into the modern is to help herself in long term, but the U.S. must draw lessons from the British in the 19th century. The British was known as the sun never set Empire in the 19th century, but in the end of the 19th century, many overseas colonies brought Britain more and more trouble and burden, not only in money spending, but also in troops sending, finally the smart British had to choose to give up to maximize the payoffs and minimize the costs. I think America should learn something from UK. Relationship between the two countries is as same as relationship between two people. Whether the two get along well with each other depends on the consistency of core values of the two in long-term, but the benefit in short-term. For example, the relationship between U.S., China and Japan, frankly speaking, China who has 1.4 billion population and 9.6 million square kilometers is more useful to U.S. than Japan, but because of the political system of Communist dictatorship, I think U.S. will stand on the Japanese side, would rather sacrifice the economic interests in China in short term. I hope U.S. doesn’t be kidnapped by Japan, please give more time to Chinese poor people.

2012年9月15日星期六

I really go to do my calling.


Mayans really bless me to get Visa. I am really going to have an insane trip. I will try my best to do my calling. It is real time to have a change.

“Thanks to all of you, we have the revolution, and we are going to need it. Because there is a guy in the white house who represents all those religious extremists that people came to this country to escape. But that is because there is a backlash against all the great social justice movements and if we hadn’t have a frontlash, we wouldn’t now be having a backlash. So we are just going to keep doing and do it more and better. We are going to not only vote but reform the way we vote. We are going to contribute not only when we are asked, but everytime we pay our bills. We are not only going to change women to fit the world, but change the world to fit women, and we are going to become the change we want to see in the world. So first this conference, then the world.”

2012年9月1日星期六

The Mayan Prophecy of 2012

About Mayan culture, to be honest, I don’t know much about it, but I hold an awe of heart to it, because too many mysteries are still unbelievable in Mayans, but I really don’t believe that the world will end in 2012. I agree that doomsday is a very significant misunderstanding among modern people, and what Mayans meant was that a big Shift and Awareness will happen in human Physiology and Consciousness on December 21, 2012.

    I like this sentence “The 2012 Shifting of World Ages Is Calling Us to Re-Connect with Nature's Wisdom”. I think “Nature’s Wisdom” here means completely unlocking the mystery of female orgasm. I grew up in a communist tyranny country, and of course accept the atheism education all the time, but probably because I was not a good student, I really have a fatalistic feeling that everything was arranged already. Although I have started writing to all of sexual professors in 2010, but no one chose to trust me. Maybe this is just my destiny, and I have been arranged to reveal this mystery in 2012.

    If the Mayan culture really chose me to wake the sleeping women in 2012, and if I really can help human beings to open a new era of mankind, and if everything was predestined, I hope the Mayans can bless me. My luck has always been bad from childhood, and recently I made an appointment to get Visa in 911.

    Please bless me succeed in getting Visa and be safe on the trip to U.S. “Sometimes, your whole life boils down to one insane move.” in Avatar. My life was destined to boil down to this insane trip.

2012年8月26日星期日

Should Lawrence summers apologize?

On Friday, January 14, 2005, Harvard President Dr. Lawrence Summers suggested that “innate differences” between men and women might be one reason fewer women succeed in science and math careers. In addition, Summers questioned how much of a role discrimination plays in the scarcity of female professors in science and engineering at elite universities. Summers' remarks on women draw fire, and then he had to write a letter to apologize hypocritically “I deeply regret the impact of my comments and apologize for not having weighed them more carefully.”, and at the end of the letter he wrote some high-sounding words to praise women’s contribution in society and sciences.

    Should Lawrence Summers apologize? No, I don’t think so, because what he said is true, and he was just the boy who pointed out the emperor has no clothes on. In fact, as a woman, from my self-esteem, I do not want to admit, but I have to admit, in general, men indeed do better than women in math and science. As female, if you are angry because of  what Lawrence said, that is completely “weak country mentality”. There is no need to be angry due to a sentence. First of all, we have to admit that, in many ways, male performance is better than female, if we don’t have the bearing to accept this fact, we will never be able to make any progress in future. Secondly, we must look for the reasons why women do worse than men, what cause the difference? Finally, under the premise that the gene can not be changed, what can we learn from men and how can we improve our capacity?

   I don’t know what exactly the Lawrence said "innate differences" mean. if he meant that there are some special talent only in Y chromosome, but not in X chromosome, I can only say that Lawrence is really good student of “penis envy" of Freud, and he so overestimated the Y chromosome. Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes, each pair has two homologous chromosomes, one is from mother, the other is from father. On homologous chromosomes, there are so many alleles which control the same trait, but some are dominant genes, and some are invisible genes, and X and Y are just a pair of homologous chromosomes. I guess the only difference is Y nearly has all dominant genes, in comparison of X chromosome, although males have both X and Y chromosomes, but their external appearance only determined by the genes on Y.

   I don't deny that men really can take advantage of the Y chromosome to synthesize some special proteins, hormone or other substances which women really don’t have, and males and female also can take the same substances from X chromosome they both have. We have to admit this, but don’t overestimate the Y chromosome, to any sexual organs on male controlled by the Y chromosome, there must be the homologous organs controlled by the X chromosome to respond on female. In fact, with the decryption of human gene sequence, we already start to reveal the mystery slowly.
Figure 1 is Genital Development Before Birth
Fig.1  Genital Development Before Birth

Figure 2 is Development of the external genitalia: Indifferent ( A and B ); Male external genitalia ( C and E ); and Female external genitalia ( D and F ). Gray's Anatomy (1918) figure 1119 (Drawn from the Ecker-Ziegler models).
Fig. 2  Development of the external genitalia

Fig.1 and Fig. 2 are previous theoretical studies, the followings are real pictures around ourselves.






    Apparently, we can see that there is a raphe both on glans and foreskin. Use little logical thought, we can conclude that, in the process of development of penis, penis wrapped to backward, and folded the urethra into penis, and the original separated labia majora get fusion into scrotum. In the process of development of clitoris, clitoris shaft, urethra, vagina and labia didn’t get fusion, so there is no raphe on clitoris.

    First start common development, and then differentiation. Fact, in embryo research, people have admitted that the genital tubercle develops into the phallus, the first rudiment of the penis or clitoris. I am really curious why Freud and Dr. Ernest Grafenberg still think that women should and must get orgasm through vagina, regardless Gray's Anatomy had showed up very clearly in 1918. I have to question their motives. Did they believe that men also can use other organs or glands to collect pleasure for orgasm, except penis? You must certainly laugh at me, if I tell you that high nose on West people is used to breathe, but flat nose on Asians is used to eat. Penis and clitoris shaft, different appearance, but the same functionality.

    I admit that male perform more excellent than female in many area, such as art, music, sports, creative pursuits, science, politics and so on, not only in math and science Lawrene mentioned. But why? Objectively speaking, I really don't think Y chromosome is the key, not because I am a female and I have penis envy. If Lawrence was right "innate differences” really exist, as the result is every man should be smarter than every woman., but not that way. Undoubtedly, a lot of people exaggerate the differences between men and women, like lawrence, but we should see essence through the appearance. But why in general men are more outstanding than women in many ways? I think sex is the key, precisely orgasm is the key. Orgasm really matters a lot. If you ask me what is you favorite activity? I will answer orgasm. It not only can make me release, but also can give me logic and inspiration, maybe that is why I am different from other women. I believe that, one day when women can get out of the trap of reproduction to find the true themselves, women will be the same excellent in every area, maybe more excellent.

2012年8月14日星期二

Evolutions of male and female indeed developed in different ways.


Recently, I found old interesting news from internet. Evolutionary biologists have long believed that the mammalian Y chromosome is essentially stagnant, having lost most of its genes hundreds of millions of years ago. But new research from MIT's Whitehead Institute, published in this week's issue of Nature, overturns that theory. The research team, led by Whitehead Institute director and MIT biology professor David Page, showed that the Y chromosome is actually evolving rapidly and continuously remaking itself. The results overturned the expectation that the chimp and human Y chromosomes would be highly similar. Instead, they differ remarkably in their structure and gene content. The chimp Y, for example, has lost one third to one half of the human Y chromosome genes--a significant change in a relatively short period of time. Page points out that this is not all about gene decay or loss. He likens the Y chromosome changes to a home undergoing continual renovation.

I agree with Page on his result that Y chromosomes indeed evolved faster than expected, but I don’t agree the explanation they gave. The followings are my questions.

1, "The region of the Y that is evolving the fastest is the part that plays a role in sperm production," say Jennifer Hughes, first author on the Nature paper and a postdoctoral researcher in Whitehead Institute Director David Page's lab. 

I don’t agree with Jennifer on this point. Frankly speaking, I don’t think the Y chromosome plays any role directly in sperm production, because in the end of MeiosisⅠ, the X chromosome and the Y chromosome have already been divided into different cells, and in simple words, the MeiosisⅡ is just a normal Mitosis. At the end of MeiosisⅡ, male produce four spermatids, two have X chromosome, other two have Y chromosome, and formation of sperm is just a deformation based on meiosis finished.

  
 
If Jennifer was right that some region of the Y plays a role in sperm production, the sperm which contains X never exist, because they don’t Y chromosome at all, but the fact is that the spermatids, whatever it contains X or Y, always can turn into sperm cells.

About Azoospermia, in general, it can be classified into two forms:

Obstructive Azoospermia: In this situation, sperm are produced but not ejaculated. The main cause is a physical obstruction (obstructive azoospermia) of the posttesticular genital tracts. The most common reason is a vasectomy done to induce contraceptive sterility.

Non-obstructive Azoospermia: it can be divided into two situations.

Pretesticular azoospermia: it is characterized by inadequate stimulation of otherwise normal testicles and genital tract. Typically, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels are low (hypogonadotropic) commensurate with inadequate stimulation of the testes to produce sperm. In simple words, the reason why a little boy don't have sperm is that there is not enough sex hormones to make him produce a sperm.

Testicular azoospermia: In this situation the testes are abnormal, atrophic, or absent, and sperm production severely disturbed to absent. In simple words, This may be due to chromosomal abnormalities, such as Klinefelter syndrome (karyotype 47XXY), or microdeletions of the Y chromosome, which is the loss of genetic material involved in spermatogenesis.

About Klinefelter syndrome (karyotype 47XXY) or XYY, XXXYY, XXXY, XXXXY gene types, due to the odd chromosomes, spermatocytes have disorder in Synapsis MeiosisⅠ, so they can’t produce a sperm.

About Y chromosome infertility, some research illustrates that it is usually caused by deletions of genetic material in regions of the Y chromosome called azoospermia factor (AZF) A, B, or C. Genes in these regions are believed to provide instructions for making proteins involved in sperm cell development, although the specific functions of these proteins are not well understood. Deletions in the AZF regions may affect several genes. The missing genetic material likely prevents production of a number of proteins needed for normal sperm cell development, resulting in Y chromosome infertility. I agree with this explanation very much, as everyone knows, genes not only control the synthesis of protein, but also steroid substances and enzymes. The Y chromosome is still there, but lack of some genes result lack of some special protein or steroid or enzymes, then result azoospermia.

In summary, the mechanism of sperm deformation is not completely understood so far, but I really don’t think Y directly plays a role in sperm production. I think Jennifer Hughes overestimated the Y chromosome too much, maybe she fell into the trap of "penis envy” of Freud.

If conditions permit, we can change the positions between spermatocyte and oocyte, and check whether spermatocyte can still produce into sperm and oocyte can still produce into egg cell and polar bodies or not. I guess it is impossible, and Thai Shemale is the biggest evidence for that. They can’t produce sperm, because they were injected estrogen since very little boys, but Y chromosomes are still in their genes. This can illustrate that very well chromosome is not directly involved in sperm formation.

2, The researchers suspect several factors are at play in the divergent evolution of human and chimp Y chromosomes, including differences in mating behaviors. Because a female chimpanzee may mate with many male chimpanzees around the same time, any genes on the Y chromosome that lead to enhanced sperm production offer a distinct competitive advantage. If a Y chromosome with genes for enhanced sperm production also carries mutations that alter or eliminate a gene not related to sperm production, those less advantageous mutations also get passed on, resulting in a Y chromosome with far fewer genes than the human Y.

The reason why I don’t agree with them on this point is that I don’t deny that positive selection is driving rapid evolution, but apparently, human evolution is much more far than chimps, in other words many many years ago, human also have the group sex as same as chimps that a female human may mate with many male human during her estrus, but with the evolution of human beings, we get rid of the chimps mode. There must be something which drives human to evolve out of chimps. Please notice that: male chimps only have sex with female chimps during her estrus, but male human don't have sex only during female human estrus, and apparently the purpose of male chimps having sex is only for reproduction, but it doesn’t apply to male human. I think a rational thought is that we should focus on some behaviors which human have but chimps don’t have, not on some behaviors which chimps have but human don't’ have. If we go to the opposite direction, we are not going to find the truth at all. Now we don’t have to consider that why the chimp Y has lost one third to one half of the human Y chromosome genes, we have to reconsider why human has increased one half to one of the chimp Y chromosome genes. Maybe the extra genes in male human are the key why the purpose for male human having sex is not only for reproduction.

In general, I agree that Y chromosomes indeed evolve fast than other chromosomes, whatever in horizontal comparison or vertical comparison. In horizontal dimension, as a female, I have to admit that men in general are more outstanding, smart or rational than women in all areas, wherever politics, science or sports. Why is that? Because women don’t have Y. Does Y really have so magic power? Yes, it does, men have really jumped out of the trap of reproduction, but women still as tool as reproduction. In vertical dimension, male human indeed evolved much faster than male chimps, male chimps are still stuck in the trap of reproduction.